Flukes can be true

The fact that a trait,
or characteristic
cannot
be found else were,
does not make it false,
it might
be a "fluke" (by literary definition)
but still doesnt make it false.

The true elusive obvious

The world
is
a
visual metaphor
of
our
sight
and
perception

Activate your minds' eye, and keep it vigilant

When they go, you view the world differently or u start to.
Forms
dont visually change,
color
does not change,
and
visual perspective
does not
become
bizarre.
Only sensations and perceptions change,
most of that
proclaimed
"differently",
is inert.
A new
internal
spectrum
for
diagnosis of
every
known
and
yet to be
known form

DRAWROF | FORWARD

They go,
we wear a mask for so long,
it becomes our face.
I say,
we all wear masks,
i wear the reverse
side of a mask that
was heart crafted out
of the illusions
society,
refuses
to
un-hallucinate
itself from.

My questioning of urban diction

At a social gathering, a random stranger supposedly compliments another. Now i recognize this to be a compliment, due to the emotion cues of gratitude exhibited by the stranger being complimented:

For the purpose of this skit, i shall refer to the stranger giving the compliment as "the complimenter" and the stranger receiving the compliment, "the complimentee":

Complimenter: You look fresh.

Complimentee: Thank you, you know it's not easy.

Me: you respond gratitudinally to referral toward yourself such as "fresh". It but recalls memories of my mother, waking up early in the morning in order to pick out "fresh tomatoes and onions" from the early morning market. "Steaming hot fresh out the oven, baked bread". If the elusive obvious, still eludes you, perhaps i shall make it less abstruse for your mental capability by saying, "I'm not learned of urban diction to enunciate such, nor of literary perfection to judge, but my innocent question is "why attribute in-animate characteristics to yourself?", i quite understand the logic of personification, but by value construct, i believe its' nature is from animate object (higher social value) to in-animate object (lower social value). Now, does that mean if your case be blatantly referred to as personification, it is also a transfer of attribute from (higher social value) [tomatoes and onions] to (lower social value) [you]?